Post by walterleo on Aug 4, 2021 13:00:34 GMT
In october 2017 a storm front created "one of those days" at LOWS:
www.bing.com/videos/search?q=lows+near+crash&docid=608024389781643014&mid=2C662EFEFFA6288C52B02C662EFEFFA6288C52B0&view=detail&FORM=VIRE
An Embraer E195 of AUSTRIAN nearly "bought the farm", now the report is ready:
cdn.aerotelegraph.com/production/uploads/2021/08/171027_embraer_salzburg_86072.pdf
PF was the captain (15.000 flight hours,600 in type and flight instructor for the Fokker 100), he initiated a go around pushed forward the throttles to 70 % and the AT "decided" this was not enough for a go around and brought back the power for final approach speed, 73 seconds passed with decaying airspeed, 14 dig nose up and marginal climb towards the mountains, finally after the rattling of the stick shaker the TOGA button was pushed, so a deadly crash was avoided.
The report now cites "pilot error" explained by an "unexpected startling automatic warning" of "windshear". Strange argument, after hearing the ATIS of that day (some hours earlier).
How the pilots second best friend (the AT) can fly an airplane into stick shaker speed disregarding a clear throttle forward input, the programmers of that system should be able to explain.
Kind regards
Walter
P.S.: Why a seasoned pilot after 15.000 flighthours could panic after he hears "WINDSHEAR! WINDSHEAR!" and did not simply firewall the throttles, which would have avoided the false reaction of the AT was not explained, maybe for not discussing the noise abatement problems at LOWS.
The ILS with a difficult go around:
and LOWS "littered" with noise monitoring points:
www.bing.com/videos/search?q=lows+near+crash&docid=608024389781643014&mid=2C662EFEFFA6288C52B02C662EFEFFA6288C52B0&view=detail&FORM=VIRE
An Embraer E195 of AUSTRIAN nearly "bought the farm", now the report is ready:
cdn.aerotelegraph.com/production/uploads/2021/08/171027_embraer_salzburg_86072.pdf
PF was the captain (15.000 flight hours,600 in type and flight instructor for the Fokker 100), he initiated a go around pushed forward the throttles to 70 % and the AT "decided" this was not enough for a go around and brought back the power for final approach speed, 73 seconds passed with decaying airspeed, 14 dig nose up and marginal climb towards the mountains, finally after the rattling of the stick shaker the TOGA button was pushed, so a deadly crash was avoided.
The report now cites "pilot error" explained by an "unexpected startling automatic warning" of "windshear". Strange argument, after hearing the ATIS of that day (some hours earlier).
How the pilots second best friend (the AT) can fly an airplane into stick shaker speed disregarding a clear throttle forward input, the programmers of that system should be able to explain.
Kind regards
Walter
P.S.: Why a seasoned pilot after 15.000 flighthours could panic after he hears "WINDSHEAR! WINDSHEAR!" and did not simply firewall the throttles, which would have avoided the false reaction of the AT was not explained, maybe for not discussing the noise abatement problems at LOWS.
The ILS with a difficult go around:
and LOWS "littered" with noise monitoring points: