|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Jun 3, 2011 12:32:09 GMT
I prefer it that way .... nothingh like having something to tiockle whilst your flying ;D Some very late production B737-200´s "might" have been ewquipped with AT´s, but, so far as I´m aware, the majoriy weren´t. I know for a fact that all of the AIR NEW ZEALAND operated aircraft (and there were many) .... both in the original late 1960´s form, and the mid 1980´s ADVC deliveries. as well as the many aircraft we leased too, and inclkuding all of he Pacific based aircraft operarted by POLYNESIAN AIRLINES, AIR PACIFIC, SOLOMAN AIRLINES, and AIR NAURU .... most certainly weren´t AT equipped. "IF" I were ever preparing B737-200 panels and FDe for HJG hosting .... then I most certainly would not equip these aircraft with AT´s. Mark C BOG/COL
|
|
|
Post by hitperson on Jun 3, 2011 14:58:03 GMT
many thanks chaps, the Ifly one was the one i was looking for. i will give this a go this evening and post up screen shots
|
|
|
Post by SeaDuck on Aug 16, 2011 20:20:37 GMT
Not sure if this is what you're looking for, since it is for the "Nex Gen" 737s: I have been very happy with the SkyDecks payware panel. It can be used with any 737, with the appropriate changes made to the files. I have used it successfully with the very nice Project Opensky 737-700. Lots of nice 'bells and whistles', PA announcements, etc. on the panel. Link: www.sky-decks.com/
|
|
|
Post by walterleo on Sept 2, 2011 15:49:35 GMT
Hi Mark:
Some of them found their way afterwards to Mexico and its now defunct NOVA AIR earning their life hauling hollydaymakers ( like me) between Mexico City and Cancun (at very low prices!). The planes still looked and smelled well, the crews were friendly and efficient, the pilots flew very smoothly and without an accident, a pitty they are gone.
Kind regards
Walter
|
|
|
Post by louross on Sept 2, 2011 16:35:30 GMT
Mexico. MagniCharter flies reular trips to CanCun and other areas, even tho they are legally registered as a charter company as opposed to a scheduled airline. I think one of the newer companies is also flying 732's, maybe Azteca or Allegro or whoever they are.
But, I have a question. Why would you pay for a 732 when TinmouseII is free?
lr.
|
|
|
Post by dutchman2 on Sept 2, 2011 19:03:39 GMT
Just a point, according to a friend and work associate with the Seattle folks; -600 and up are considered the NG (next generation) -300/-400/-500 are now the classics -200 are referred to as Jurassic
|
|
|
Post by walterleo on Sept 3, 2011 13:42:00 GMT
Why would you pay for a 732 when TinmouseII is free? lr. ;)Excellent question! Mexico: Magnicharter still exists and 3 years ago they still flew 737-200 and -300. Dont know how they are doing now, on their hompage there are 737-300 and AB 320 visible, but no fleet list. But Allegro never had a 737, they had 727 and MD 80 and DC9-14, one of these strayed 300 nm offcourse and landed without fuel in Tampico 300 m short of the runway, no fatalities some passangers with injuries. Allegro is defunct (2004) like AVIACSA (2010) (which had 737-200 also) and Azteca (2007), but they didnt have 737-200. The last time I bought a ticket from Magincharters the flight actually was in an AVIACSA 737 think it was a 300. Kind regards Walter
|
|
|
Post by christrott on Sept 3, 2011 17:30:56 GMT
Just a point, according to a friend and work associate with the Seattle folks; -600 and up are considered the NG (next generation) -300/-400/-500 are now the classics -200 are referred to as Jurassic Originally, the -100/-200 were the "Classic", the -300/-400/-500 were the "New Generation", and the -600/-700/-800/-900 were the "Next Generation". Unfortunately, some smart person decided to re-ID the original CFM models as "Classic" back around 2006 which muddied the waters as many books had already been released by then with the original family names. This is where much of the confusion comes from.
|
|
|
Post by Trebor on Sept 4, 2011 23:22:39 GMT
captain sim just released a -100...the only -100 in the flight sim world. which brings me to ask if HJG will host a -100 of their own?
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Sept 5, 2011 4:25:09 GMT
Sorry to have to disappoint you .... but .... "NO" .... meaning we/HJG doesn't have any plans to.
In fact we're too committed to another project at this time anyway !
Mark C AKL/NZ
|
|
|
Post by garryrussell on Sept 5, 2011 8:28:34 GMT
I just use the 100-900 designation
I've never referred to new Generation, Next Generation or Classic....tbh it's silly terminology and tells you nothing
People who are interested know what a 200 is, what an 800 is etc that says itl all.....so it's pointless
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Sept 5, 2011 10:05:28 GMT
YEP .... -100/-200/-300/-400/-500/-600/-700/-800/-900 designation suffixes tell one "all they really need to know" Mark C AKL/NZ
|
|
|
Post by christrott on Sept 6, 2011 1:28:15 GMT
captain sim just released a -100...the only -100 in the flight sim world. which brings me to ask if HJG will host a -100 of their own? Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Captain Sim did *NOT* release a -100. They released a very early model -200. Yeah, it's got the short nacelles and JT9D-7 engines, but those were on the early -200's too. All of the -100's were delivered with Clamshell reversers off the 727, the rear door was hinged at the bottom and had an integral airstair, and there were quite a few other (but more minor) differences. The aircraft they've delivered is more representative of a late-life 737-100 when all the -200 modifications (Rohr target-type reversers, normal rear door, leading edge slat seals and rework) and a few other mods had been incorporated. As such, unless CS is planning on correcting their gross error, then we still won't have a true 737-100 available for any sim.
|
|
|
Post by botamern on Sept 6, 2011 2:14:57 GMT
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Captain Sim did *NOT* release a -100. Ummmm... yes, they did. Whilst the model may be more representative of a late in life plane that was modified from it's original delivery condition, to claim it's not a 737-100 is a bit off the mark. Besides, their fuselage on their model is too short to be a -200.
|
|
|
Post by Trebor on Sept 6, 2011 4:25:31 GMT
wouldn't re-doing Erick Cantu's -200 be simply shortening the fuselage?
|
|