|
|
Post by railrunner130 on Jun 16, 2011 11:41:51 GMT
That's for the flight attendant's overnight bags....
|
|
|
|
Post by 99ny on Jun 16, 2011 15:02:24 GMT
Yeah thats what I was referring to - I've never seen that before. @railrunner -- Riiiiiiiight ;D |
|
|
|
Post by garryrussell on Jun 16, 2011 17:39:29 GMT
As an aside David Maltby's VC 10 has a fifth engine pod on the civil versions but few have ever noticed  Garry |
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Jun 16, 2011 20:23:36 GMT
I did ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by james42 on Jun 16, 2011 22:14:19 GMT
As an aside David Maltby's VC 10 has a fifth engine pod on the civil versions but few have ever noticed Garry Where ? Can you post a screen shot please. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Jun 16, 2011 23:36:02 GMT
Under the wing :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by spey511 on Jun 17, 2011 0:54:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by garryrussell on Jun 17, 2011 9:16:11 GMT
J42 I can't post a screen shot...don't even have the model loaded. It's in the intructions somewhere  From memory...it's the civil version only and the same command that deploys the tanker hoses I could be wrong though ;D Garry
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Jun 17, 2011 11:01:24 GMT
I'm pretty sure it's the "TailHook" command....
|
|
|
|
Post by hitperson on Jun 17, 2011 15:41:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Jun 22, 2011 19:39:54 GMT
Just catching up with this particular posting again .... among other things too  The underwing capsule associated with the B707-138B was a means of ferrying an engine from one place to some place else. The capsule was fitted only when, and if, required to do so .... of course. When used it was as rare an event as a 5th engine being similarly ferried on a B747-200B .... which I, personally, have only ever seen once in my entire 32 years association, up closeand pesonal, with civil aviation. I think QANTAS was "the first" carrier (if not "one of the first") to actually employ this method of engine transportation using the B707. Comming back also to the subject of this particular Congolese owned/operated B707-138B currently at MIA ....I saw this aircraft "again" at MIA last Friday afternoon. Unlike was the case when I first saw it parked there on April 18th .... the aircraft now seems to have been moved inside the maintenance hangar where it was being worked on at the time. In view of other news I had reported to me last week .... I suspect this aircraft may be about to get its engines back, so, in terms of future .... possible textruction for HJG representation(though niot confirmed) .... it will be interesting to see how those engines actually look (livery-wise) once this aircraft re-emerges from that hangar. Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by eastern1004 on Jun 22, 2011 21:34:42 GMT
Ya'll might want to look again at D Maltby's models. The RAF VC10 C1K has pods under each wing, but they are nothing like the pod seen in the above pic see the pics-VC10_C1K.zip - RAF VC10 C1K models & textures www.dmflightsim.co.uk/vickers_vc10.htmNone of his civil airline models has a pod similar to the one you see on the East African pic above.  |
|
|
|
Post by hitperson on Jun 23, 2011 6:49:51 GMT
Ya'll might want to look again at D Maltby's models. The RAF VC10 C1K has pods under each wing, but they are nothing like the pod seen in the above pic see the pics-VC10_C1K.zip - RAF VC10 C1K models & textures www.dmflightsim.co.uk/vickers_vc10.htmNone of his civil airline models has a pod similar to the one you see on the East African pic above. press tailhook down  |
|
|
|
Post by james42 on Jun 23, 2011 10:25:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by eastern1004 on Jun 23, 2011 14:11:57 GMT
Thanks James for no explanation, just one-upmanship. I mentioned none of the pics showing current models had such a pod visible. I was correct. I have not read where such a pod becomes visible when using certain keys. That might have been in your explanation, but, instead we get what we got. Thanks |
|
