|
|
Post by alex94 on Mar 23, 2018 1:53:53 GMT
Hi guys, from what i can see, all represented models have vertical operating reverse buckets, but the -50 series and other later series had the buckets angled inwards 17 degrees.
I was wondering if this could be considered in the future as a model update please.
Kind regards
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Mar 23, 2018 2:40:19 GMT
I think I've told you .... "a few times now and since early last year" .... no updates (other than those already stated) are planned for any of our existing 3D models .... among which includes our DC-9's  There are "limitations" in regard to what we're actually capable of achieving and if we can't do something then that simply has to be tolerated .... I'm sorry  Whether or not the fully extended/deployed bucket type reverser is representative of particular/earlier marques of JT8D engines .... or the 17* degree canter representative of particular/lter marques of JT8D engines or is a feature (possibly) imposed by later still husk-kitting modifications of these engines .... I know not. All I do know is .... the 3D models we currently offer are the way Nick designed them .... and the way they'll likely "remain" too .... since "no further updates are planned or expected" .... AND .... the reverser bucket animations on each of our DC-9 models may be tripped in either of the following two ways .... 1. A soft tap of the "F2" keyboard command to engage reverse thrust .... results in a partial bucket deflection ....  2. A solid/momentarily prolonged depression of the "F2" keyboard command to engage reverse thrust .... with full bucket deflection ....  In either case careful and momentary depression of the "F3" keyboard command may be used to ease out of reverse thrust more gradually .... whilst a solid/momentarily prolonged depression of "F2"{ keyboard commands is normally used to cancel reverse thrust more abruptly. What I've described and illustrated above per #1 and #2 may simply be "transitional stages" of the complete reverser animation .... with an accidental interruption between each stage .... rather than being intended to represent anything like a 17* reverser deflection  Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by alex94 on Mar 23, 2018 2:44:56 GMT
I know you said that mark, that’s why I said considered.
Also that’s fine, as I’m not sure of your guys ability so all I can do is ask.
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Mar 23, 2018 3:27:24 GMT
No point re-phrasing any question Alex in order to try'n extract an answer .... otherwise things just get "unnecessarily repetitive and monotonous" .... for us all  "IF" consideration/reconsideration is given to anything, then, a public announcement "may" be made .... BUT .... as I've also previously mentioned (to you) we seldom ever, if ever, publicly announce our intentions. Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by alex94 on Mar 23, 2018 4:19:18 GMT
Understood mark
|
|
