|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Jan 17, 2008 10:17:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Madge - HJG on Jan 17, 2008 10:42:21 GMT
looks very good but I wonder what it will do to the average PC running FSX??
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Jan 17, 2008 11:28:50 GMT
I can't comment on that of course, but I can say so much that I used the FS9 version when it came out, and I wouldn't consider using FS9 with out it.
I think those guys know what they are doing, and given the configuration possibilities they describe, I would think that it would fit any system. According to them selves, the impact on framerates are minimal.... the mere texture replacements shouldn't give troubles, but the inbuilt weather engine might well do... and we all know what cloud textures do even the default....
I guess we'll have to wait and see. Still the screenshots look mighty fine...!
Anyway what is an average PC nowadays ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by oldngray on Aug 3, 2008 12:50:28 GMT
Dan, do you know if this would this conflict with GE PRO on FS9?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by Tony Madge - HJG on Aug 4, 2008 8:29:06 GMT
I would assume so as it replaces textures...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Aug 4, 2008 10:17:29 GMT
agreed. My own private philosophy is not mix several products / addons that tamper with the same ting. It's almost doomed to go wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Aug 4, 2008 11:27:09 GMT
"VERY GOOD ADVICE" Dan !  Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by oldngray on Aug 6, 2008 16:55:24 GMT
Any thoughts on which package is better? GE Pro or ?
Thanks
thingy
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan K. Hansen on Aug 6, 2008 20:45:51 GMT
I would certainly go for REX when its out. But then again, I'm not really into payware  |
|
