What Payware to get!

[ZippCalculator]

Hey
I've been looking at getting a payware aircraft for FSX, i'm looking at the CLS 767 or QualityWings 757
My system specifications are on the low side (2.0GHZ dual core, 4GB ram, windows 7) and I'm wondering which would be better, the CLS 767 has lower system requirements, but isn't as imersive on the FMC etc.
Any ideas,

Cheers

Zipp

[Tony Madge - HJG]

I have heard the QW 757 is good, but I am not and FSX user, how well FSX runs on your set up will determine how complex you can go I guess, happy hunting

[Falcon]

I run FSX, but don't have any opinion on which payware to purchase. I'm running Vista however, and I found if I run FSX as XP2 it runs much smoother, faster and loads a tad bit faster. That is due in part a Vista problem as it is a pig. Your specs are close to what I'm running and depending on settings, I can get 50+ frame rates running as XP2. Just for your info. Good luck on picking one out. I'm using freeware 757's and 767's.
Falcon

[M.I.B.]

I use QW 757 in FS2004, I'm super pleased with it! Been trying to get CLS 767 as well in the last decades, there's always something that catches my eye and prevents me from getting the 767.

Generally, CLS is good, but not hard-core; QW is kinda hard core yet very easy to use, even if you're not a hard-core simmer yet, "complexity simplified" as they say. I recommend the QW 757, just my 2 eurocents.

[ZippCalculator]

Jan 17, 2014 23:55:54 GMT M.I.B. said:

I use QW 757 in FS2004, I'm super pleased with it! Been trying to get CLS 767 as well in the last decades, there's always something that catches my eye and prevents me from getting the 767.

Generally, CLS is good, but not hard-core; QW is kinda hard core yet very easy to use, even if you're not a hard-core simmer yet, "complexity simplified" as they say. I recommend the QW 757, just my 2 eurocents.

I have heard only good stuff about the QW757.
But I might actually spend that money possibly building a good FSX rig