|
|
Post by alex94 on Jun 6, 2020 14:34:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Jun 6, 2020 21:52:07 GMT
Can't .... because it's a CARAVELLE 10B3 .... a "different" version of the -10 SERIES than we currently publicly offer. Esa completed "a -10B3" model .... as per imagery presented by both he, and I, within the following linked posting (those postings dated beteeen September 2017 and February 2018) .... tonymadgehjg.proboards.com/thread/5760/devellopment-caravelles?page=2.... and whilst I "DO" have this model a number of (albeit minor) difficulties have arisen as follows (as stated per separate postings after the images within the above linked posting) .... - We only have the "non VHF" model at this stage (the SB aircraft .... F-GEPC .... requires the "VHF model" which has not yet been supplied .... no fault of Esa's though because he's since been bogged down with R/W priorities. - Whilst we have "base textures" for the -10B3 model we currently hold we "DO NOT, as yet, have a PSD for this model version .... and as you're already recently aware, per a certain project of your own, the party whom previously produced PSD's for the CARAVELLE's has since quit FS .... and all FS development too (not because of any negative interaction with either us or AFG incidentally .... and as you're also personally aware) .... and which creates yet another related issue because if PSD's are developed by another party then textures produced from these likely won't be of the same standard/quality as those for preceeding CARAVELLE models. - Whilst we have 3/"three" CARAVELLE 10B3 panels (as is also evidenced per imagery within the above link posting) we've also run into an "AP mode" related problem with these and which is stubbornly refusing to respond positively to previously attempted resolutions . Successfully resolve each of these (albeit minor) issues first .... "THEN" we can then launch the CARVELLE 10B3 "properly", but if we were do do so now, on the basis of what we currently have, then I feel we'd only be deceiving ourselves as well as the others whom have worked "darned hard" to get it as far as its so far come, and we'd generally doing the simulation "an injustice" .... which something I'm simply not prepared to do/risk  Therefore there'll be "no CARAVELLE 10B3's .... until such time a each of these issues can be adequately/properly resolved. Sorry .... but .... that's the way it "IS/HAS TO BE" .... until further notice  Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by alex94 on Jun 7, 2020 20:30:34 GMT
Well hopefully we do get some new models in the future. I think the PSD problem is less of an issue as there are many great painters out there. But the other problems, dunno..
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Jun 7, 2020 21:10:38 GMT
The PSD issue is the greater of the problem/s .... simply because some details of the -10B3 are different from those of the -10B1 and need to be worked up specidically. Sure .... any models can just be "painted" .... but then .... one ends up with "bland detailess" textures like those evident per the "test (only) images" presented within the above-linked posting .... and which is something within "our team" are simply not content doing. If something's worth doing at all .... then .... we try to do it "properly" .... or we just don't do it at all If we were to release bland and detailess textures we'd not only be letting the community down, but rather, we'd also be letting the entire project down too. It's disappointing enough, to those whom (like me) have, and still are, working on this project (as we can) to run into the particular issues we've encountered (and which is "nobody's fault") but not being able to fully resolve them (yet) .... however .... that's the way FS development work goes sometimes .... it's "NOT" easy by any means  Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by alex94 on Jun 8, 2020 0:34:39 GMT
There are some painters out there I could get into contact with, who wouldn’t tarnish the HJG image
|
|
|
|
Post by aerofoto - HJG Admin on Jun 8, 2020 2:51:25 GMT
No thank you .... this'll be resolved (if at all) by "the actual developers concerned" .... and in conjunction with ourselves too of course since we've maintained "a darned good relationship" with each of the other parties involved. Mark C AKL/NZ |
|
|
|
Post by alex94 on Jun 8, 2020 4:03:30 GMT
fair enough mark |
|
